Quitter Prime Minister David Cameron's gamble will cost generations of Britons dearly. But Brexit seems to be profitable after all for the Big Four accountancy firms, already tipped to be hired by the government to assist in future trade negotiations.
Yesterday Financial Times reported that the Big Four firms are ready to step up to the plate and support the under-skilled (for such an unprecedented task) UK civil service.
So win-win situation for the Big Four accountants who will not only help business in the private sector navigate the Brexit storm but also the government who will pay their fees out of the deep pockets of the British taxpayer (by the way a lot of them are EU citizens).
Amid the Sterling free fall and the current constitutional crisis threatening the unity of the Kingdom itself (wait until Northern Ireland reunites with its Southern neighbours and Scotland achieves independence) Winston Churchill is surely turning in his grave, contemplating the spectacle of his own party.
This entire macabre circus has been performed to serve the personal ambitions of selfish politicians, which no doubt will come down in history as clowns who played with destiny an unnecessary round of Russian roulette.
Yet the taxpayers and future generations of Britons will have to bite such a bullet.
The Big Four will benefit from fishing in troubled waters but would they go for an even bigger catch? Now that the UK seems to be exiting the EU, would they also try to bring down the audit reform, which they very much despised?
An EU official told me last year that the Big Four deployed an army of lobbyists in Brussels to water down the reform, whose campaign was nastier and fiercer than the one to reform the banking system after the crisis.
If the readers are in doubt of how dirty that lobby became, they can ask former MEP Antonio Masip Hidalgo, who received a personal threat from a lobbyist of a Big Four firm. Alternatively, an account of this episode can be read in his book Europeos pero incorrectos (Europeans yet not courteous).
So in a scenario where the Big Four are also consultants of the Brexit negotiations, destiny will put them in a privileged position to advocate in favour of ridding the UK of audit rotation and caps on the ancillary services they can provide to audit clients.
For the time being the UK Financial Reporting Council (FRC) says that "our regulatory framework is unchanged and we will continue to apply it."
It should also be acknowledged that the accounting regulator was already acting on the findings of the then UK Competition Commission investigation of the statutory audit services markets.
In a September 2013 interview, FRC CEO Stephen Haddrill, told this magazine his views on tendering and rotation.
"Our goal is that the company is able to get the best possible auditor for its business," he said. "If you keep the same auditor for 100 years, how do you know if you've got the best one? So retendering is important."
Regarding the provision of non-audit services, Haddrill said then: "The sale of non-audit services to audit clients is damaging to the public perception of the independence of the auditor. I think it's impossible to justify it to the public at large."
Fast forward three years, and one of the questions to add to the pile of Brexit existential angst is whether or not the EU audit reform will survive in the UK.